Article
Managing Political Anxiety. How Organizations Can Reduce Risk and Support Employees
Updated

Even within boardrooms, and project sites, it is common for employees to be impacted by geopolitical tensions. Conflicts in the Middle East, Sudan and Ukraine have intensified an atmosphere of uncertainty and protest. For many, round‑the‑clock exposure to humanitarian crises and divisive commentary can foster fear, grief and helplessness, even when the event is thousands of miles away. Add cost‑of‑living pressures, debates on migration and territorial disputes, and the emotional load can quickly spill into workplace culture.
Recent survey findings capture the mood with 64% of US employees report experiencing or witnessing political disagreement at work; 71% say tensions make it harder to sustain a positive culture; and 74% feel political uncertainty is fueling burnout. These trends are echoed in the International SOS Risk Outlook 2025, where 65% of organizations identify political stress and anxiety as significant risks and 78% expect burnout and stress to impact business performance this year.
For employers with people spread across diverse risk locations, understanding how anxiety arises, and how it affects performance, safety and wellbeing, is now part of everyday Duty of Care. The physical and emotional consequences can be severe; meeting that duty starts with recognizing the hazard, assessing its impact and building supportive programs that proactively reduce risk.
Political anxiety is best described as a chronic stress response triggered by political events, elections, policy changes, international conflicts, or domestic crises. The term political anxiety gained visibility after the 2016 US election, when psychologists and political scientists began distinguishing it from general anxiety. Research links political anxiety to sleep disruption, irritability and, in severe cases, depressive symptoms or suicidal ideation during high‑stress periods. While experiences vary, the net effect is clear: political anxiety undermines health, performance and mental wellbeing across the workforce.
There are several overlapping forces that drive political anxiety at work within the workplace; however, we have outlined four key root causes.
People leaders are often not aware of the impact that economic and political uncertainty can have on the health of their personnel. – Dr Anthony Renshaw
Political anxiety rarely appears in isolation. It slows concentration and decision making, reduces productivity and work quality, and increases error rates, with a tangible rise in incident probability in high-risk sectors such as energy, transport and security. It can erode team cohesion and psychological safety, particularly in global teams where different worldviews and communication styles meet without agreed norms.
Employees may avoid commuting or business travel, driving higher absenteeism and lower mobility. Over time, prolonged anxiety contributes to clinical concerns, including anxiety disorders and depression, necessitating professional support and time away
Addressing political anxiety effectively means embedding support into culture and everyday operations rather than treating it as an ad hoc campaign.
We are seeing a growing number of requests for strategies to help organizations manage the impacts of political anxiety. – Morgan MacDonald.
Together, these actions turn Duty of Care into lived practice.
As socio political volatility evolves, organizations that normalize help seeking, invest in resilience and build psychologically safe communication will be better placed to sustain performance. Leaders play a central role: by acknowledging the reality of political anxiety, modelling healthy boundaries with information, and backing words with accessible support, they make it easier for employees to focus on their work, and recover when external stress peaks.
Q1: Is political discussion at work always harmful?
Not necessarily. Structured, respectful dialogue can be healthy and reduce tension. The key is to set clear guidelines, provide manager training and signpost support.
Q2: What’s the most effective first step for employers?
Conduct a psychosocial hazard assessment to map exposures, prioritize action and align interventions with duty of care obligations.
Q3: How do we counter misinformation without restricting information access?
Centralize vetted updates, teach simple source evaluation skills and share trusted briefings ahead of high-risk events, so employees spend less energy filtering noise.
Q4: Which risks should be escalated to clinical support?
Any sustained symptoms that impair functioning (e.g., sleep disruption, depressive symptoms, intense anxiety) should be routed to appropriate clinical pathways via EAPs or healthcare providers.